Mapleが利用可能になりました — 無料トライアルを開始する
Compare

Maple vs Dash0

Dash0 and Maple are both OpenTelemetry-native with transparent usage-based pricing and no per-seat fees. The difference is ownership: Maple is open source and self-hostable, so you can run it on your own infrastructure — including your own ClickHouse — for full data sovereignty and retention control, instead of a closed SaaS backend.

Feature Maple Dash0
Pricing model
Usage-based, transparent
Usage-based, transparent
Open source
OpenTelemetry native
Distributed tracing
Log management
Metrics & dashboards
AI / MCP integration
Self-hosting available
No vendor lock-in
Custom dashboards
Alerting
Why choose Maple

Key advantages over Dash0

Open source

Maple's source is available under the Functional Source License (FSL-1.1) — inspect every line, contribute features, and trust there are no black boxes. Dash0's backend is closed-source SaaS.

Self-hosting available

Run Maple on your own infrastructure for data residency and compliance. Dash0 is SaaS-only, so your telemetry has to live in their cloud.

Full retention control

Self-hosting puts you in control of retention and storage — keep data as long as your compliance and debugging workflows require, instead of fixed SaaS windows.

Your data, your perimeter

Keep telemetry inside your own infrastructure for sovereignty and compliance — no third-party cloud sees your data unless you choose the hosted version.

Run on your own ClickHouse

Maple's query engine speaks ClickHouse, so a self-hosted deployment can run on a ClickHouse instance you operate and scale yourself.

Drop-in pipeline migration

Both platforms ingest standard OTLP, so moving your telemetry is just re-pointing your OpenTelemetry Collector exporter — no instrumentation changes. (Dashboards and alerts are recreated in Maple.)

明確な観測を始めませんか?

5分以内でトレース、ログ、メトリクスの送信を開始。

maple.dev — オブザーバビリティ、シンプルに